Proposals to participate in the Fermi Cycle-9 Guest Investigator Program by 16:30 EST January 22, 2016 and they must be submitted via the Fermi ARK/RPS web facility. For additional details and instructions on how to propose please refer to information on this web site and to the Fermi appendix (D.6) to the 2015 ROSES NRA which is posted on the NSPIRES web site. We strongly encourage prospective proposers who have not already done so to review these documents prior to preparing their proposals.
The maximum budget cap for one and two year (Regular) proposals will be $70,000 per year. It is anticipated that the average Cycle-9 grant will be $60,000. The proportion of multi-year awards among this category is expected to be smaller than in past cycles, probably about 10%. The cap for Large Projects is unchanged. We anticipate the selection of ~30-40 Regular proposals in addition to one to three Large proposals. For additional details please refer to the Fermi appendix to the 2015 ROSES NRA, and feel free to contact the Fermi Science Support Center help desk with any questions.
The Fermi-Suzaku joint observation program has been discontinued for obvious reason, but the other joint programs will be continued for Cycle 9.
Multiwavelength observations made in conjunction with Fermi scientific investigations have the potential to enhance the scientific return of the mission and advance the field. The Fermi project has thus established a number of joint observation programs. The Fermi GI program can award optical, radio, X-ray or gamma-ray observations through Fermi’s joint programs with NRAO, NOAO, Arecibo, VERITAS, and INTEGRAL. Note that only a single year of joint-program observations can be awarded through the Fermi GI Program regardless of the duration of awarded Fermi support. There are a number of important technical and policy details regarding these joint programs and prospective proposers are strongly encouraged to refer to the respective MOUs:
Again, please note that the joint-observation programs awarded through Fermi are for one year only. We encourage all perspective proposers to consider taking advantage of these joint-program opportunities.
In recent proposal cycles about 2-5% of the submissions failed to comply with the formatting requirements that are clearly stated in the Fermi NRA, and reproduced below. Please avoid having your proposal be penalized or out-and-out rejected by following the straight forward and reasonable format requirements.
Excerpted from the Fermi NRA: "Proposals should be single-spaced, typewritten, English-language text, using one or two columns, and using an easily read font size of 12-point or larger and no more than 15 characters per horizontal inch. No smaller font should be used in the subsections of the proposal, including references, however, figure captions can be in fonts as small as 10-point. In addition, the proposal shall have no more than 5.5 lines per inch of text. Pages should have at least one-inch (2.5 cm) margins on all sides. Proposals not conforming to the format above will be declared noncompliant and rejected without any further review."
|Cycle-9 call for proposals (ROSES D.6) released||October 13, 2015|
|Proposals Due||January 22, 2016, 4:30 PM EST.|
|Proposal Peer Review||March/April 2016|
|Stage-2 Proposal Solicitation||June 2016|
|Final Selections Announced||July 2016|
|Fermi Cycle 9 Begins||August 4, 2016|
|Cycle-9 Grants issued||~Oct/Nov 2016|
The Fermi Guest Investigator Program provides funding for direct analysis of Fermi data, for supporting observations in other wavebands, for complementary theoretical studies, and more. The deadline for proposals is typically in January of each year.
Fermi PIs can propose to:
Fermi proposals may be submitted by investigators at both US and non-US institutions, but only PIs or Co-Is sited at US institutions may receive funding from NASA. Proposals without any investigators sited at a US institution will be evaluated (such an evaluation may assist an investigator obtain funding from a foreign funding agency), may result in a pointed LAT observation, or may be awarded observing time through our joint program agreements.
There are two proposal classes: (1) Regular proposals with research plans that can be completed in one or two years, and (2) Large proposals whose research plans are more expansive and may take up to three years to complete. Regular proposals spanning two years are intended for projects that could be partially accomplished in a single year, but would benefit from a more comprehensive multiple year study, as opposed to Large proposals whose scope cannot be accomplished in a single year. Regular and Large proposals have distinct page limits and budget caps and annual reporting procedures. Please refer to the Fermi appendix of the ROSES NRA for details. The large majority of selected proposals are expected to be among the Regular proposal category.
As a resource to proposers list of the titles and abstracts of programs selected in previous mission cycles is available here.
The Fermi GI Review is typically held in the early spring, and results are communicated to the Principal Investigators several weeks later. Additional interested reviewers are always welcome. If you would like to be considered as a reviewer, please send an e-mail to the HEASARC Peer Review mailbox.
If accepted, the Principal Investigator will be notified to submit Phase 2 budget proposals through NSPIRES. Details of the submission will be provided in the proposal acceptance letter.
Fermi's proposal process will have two Phases. In Phase 1 you will submit a cover page and a scientific justification; the cover page (generated by a webform) will include a maximum budget cap and the scientific justification should include a brief management section that describes the resources required (e.g., FTE). The page limit for this section is 4 pages for a Regular proposal, and 6 pages for a Large proposal. An additional page describing technical details of your proposed Suzaku, NRAO, Arecibo, VERITAS, NOAO or INTEGRAL observations is required if you are applying under the joint proposal opportunity. A peer review panel will review your Phase 1 proposal, and you will submit a Phase 2 budget proposal only if your Phase 1 proposal has been tentatively accepted.
The continuation into year two of Regular Projects that were approved for two years duration will not require a second scientific peer evaluation. The PIs of such projects will however be solicited by the NASA Shared Services Center (NSSC) for a progress report that will be reviewed by NASA prior to the release of year-2 funds.
This information is retained for historical reference only. Please refer exclusively to the documents pertaining to the current proposal cycle in preparing your proposal.